After extensive research and fact checking, elections expert Bev Harris has written a series of articles on see: BlackBoxVoting.org revealing a racist, class oriented U.S. voting system that has nothing to do with popular consent of the governed.
Vote-by-mail ballots are identified with each person who voted and assigned a weighted average that could be determined by individual data such as race, income, political leanings or whatever those who program the voting machines decide.
Like the slaves before the emancipation, people of African descent could easily be assigned, for example, 60% so that their vote is not a single vote, but 60% of one.
Harris spoke at a meeting of top election integrity advocates discussing the current state of U.S. elections and the various options to help make elections transparent and verifiable.
Harris lamented the decline of oversight in elections and believes that our system is only about 5% reliable. She believes that things have "gotten much worse in the last 10 years" and pointed to the systematic elimination of any oversight or ways to check original votes cast, such as erasing images of all original paper ballots that many vote counting machines used to tabulate. Harris’ phone connection cut out multiple times during the program. She commented that "weird things happen to both of my phones during elections." Harris thinks that presidential elections by popular vote would be much more difficult to hack and supports the elimination of the electoral college for this reason. In spite of the potential for tampering, Harris concluded that we should "be out there voting because otherwise we have just given up." https://youtu.be/eFJeVsOy5Xo
https://youtu.be/DYQqySRFHmk another view?
https://youtu.be/rVTXbARGXso Hacking Democracy
*New York over-rode the older rules: that no one has to have a voters ID (other state too)
* Votes are not traceable to verify existence
*Hackers can venerable to hacks (+other from COUNTRIES )
*...wright ins are less venerable
* ...voting' is coming through the Net soon
*Swing states are more venerable, (super delegates needed states)
* ...fraud comes through voting machines
* ...passed crooked laws, so no one can verify a vote
* ...this problem goes back to Kennedy
*Has one central machine that controls all the polling's
* HACKING was already in the news!
* Watch the vendors' who's hired to set up the voting. Once crooked they do it again and hired again.
* see: More ways Greg Palast views: from Coast to Coast am radio (see: YouTube) on Voting frauds on both Republican and Democratic parties: Material is for the most part quoted.
He discusses the dirty tricks being used by both parties to sway the outcomes of elections. In 2000, Palast uncovered the fact that 56,000 voters were illegally removed from the rolls by Governor Jeb Bush and Secretary of State Katherine Harris in Florida during the presidential election. Palast described the ever more sophisticated methods used by both parties to sway elections. Asked who would win the next election, Palast said, "the billionaires."
Palast related that was asked to endorse a Swiss company’s voting machines that were claimed to be hack-proof. He said no American election commission would buy their system precisely for this reason - Palast believes that they actually want easily hack able vote-counting systems because election fraud is considered the norm.
He stated that Trump does not have enough personal wealth to finance his own campaign and is beholden to billionaires, no matter what his campaign wants to public to believe. He then revealed that Hillary Clinton arranged for the President of oil-rich Kazakhstan to be left off the records of an indictment. The politician then paid Bill Clinton $500,000 for a single speaking date.
In spite of the tricks and fraud, Palast believes that people still need to vote because he says "they can’t steal all the votes all of the time."